DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)

Citation
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Parent Document
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Effective Date
1999-07-12
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/765199/anna-harris-v-edna-itzhaki-rafae... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (88)

Full Text

517 chars 
Ms. Harris raises three independent claims under the FHA: (1) for eviction notices contrary to established policy; (2) for disparate treatment of rental testers; and (3) for the discriminatory statement by Ms. Waldman. Central to this analysis is the characterization of evidence by the parties. Appellees seek to consider and justify each piece of evidence separately. In contrast, Ms. Harris asks this court to look at the evidence as components of a larger whole. 1. Eviction Notices Contrary to Established Policy