Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)

Citation
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Parent Document
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Effective Date
1999-07-12

Other Sections in This Document (88)

Full Text

320 chars
Ms. Harris contends that the Itzhakis’ explanation is merely pretext, citing circumstantial and direct evidence from her other claims, including the discriminatory statement by Ms. Waldman and the treatment of the rental testers. Under these facts, applying the shifting burden analysis of McDonnell Douglas and Burdine,