DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)

Citation
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Parent Document
Anna Harris v. Edna Itzhaki Rafael Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043 (1999)
Effective Date
1999-07-12
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/765199/anna-harris-v-edna-itzhaki-rafae... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (88)

Full Text

476 chars 
The Itzhakis contend that the check wasn’t there. They assert that the check could have been stolen or lost within the unsecured building. Furthermore, while the Itzhakis don’t remember calling Ms. Harris, they contend that this is merely a courtesy and consequently should not implicate FHA liability. Here the Itzhakis have provided a nondiscriminatory reason for their action-that they simply didn't get the check and that the phone call is merely a courtesy to the tenant.