Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)

Citation: Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Parent Document: Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2011-12-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/618130/stevens-v-housing-authority-of-s... ↗

Full Text

904 chars

8
  Stevens’ husband was on a home detention program that
required him to allocate a “home detention box” to a particular
residence. Stevens testified that, for a period of two to three
weeks, Broadnax allocated his home detention box to Stevens’
apartment. R. 62-3, at 40-42. Stevens conceded that during
the time the box was allocated to her address, Broadnax stayed
at her home. Although Stevens’ daughter, Ebony Harmon,
denied that Broadnax ever lived in her mother’s apartment,
she also admitted that she did not know how often Broadnax
stayed overnight at the apartment. R. 62-6, at 5-6. Given her
lack of personal knowledge of the facts, Harmon’s testimony
cannot create a genuine issue of fact in light of her mother’s
concession that Broadnax registered the home detention box
at her apartment and stayed there for two to three weeks.
16                                              No. 10-2724

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text