Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)

Citation: Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Parent Document: Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2011-12-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/618130/stevens-v-housing-authority-of-s... ↗

Full Text

841 chars

for two to three weeks without obtaining prior written
approval from HASB. R. 62-5, at 14; R. 62-3, at 41.8 Thus,
Stevens was not eligible for the apartment in the first
instance, could have been evicted even in the absence
of the events leading to the First Notice, and eventually
acceded to the Second and Third Notices which were
issued for lease violations wholly separate from the
shooting.
  If a plaintiff also seeks monetary damages, however,
the case is not moot even if the underlying misconduct
that caused the injury has ceased. Brown, 442 F.3d at 596.
We thus consider next whether Stevens suffered any
money damages as a result of the First Notice. Again,
by her own testimony, she did not suffer any out-of-
pocket losses as a result of the First Notice. R. 62-4, at 12.
After the First Notice, she did not leave the apartment

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text