Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)

Citation
Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Parent Document
Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Effective Date
2011-12-01

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

756 chars
II.
  On appeal, Stevens contends that (1) the district court
misapplied governing law on summary judgment stan-
dards; (2) the court erred in concluding that Stevens’
claims were moot; (3) the one-strike policy, as applied
to Stevens, violated the criteria set forth in Department
of Hous. & Urban Dev. v. Rucker, 535 U.S. 125 (2002);
(4) the court erred in granting summary judgment
on the segregated housing claim because the evidence
demonstrated disputed issues of material fact; (5) Stevens
had standing on all of her claims, and no claims were
barred by the statute of limitations; and (6) the court
erred in finding that evidence of other lease violations
justified Stevens’ eviction.
10                                                 No. 10-2724