Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)

Citation
Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Parent Document
Stevens v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SOUTH BEND, IND., 663 F.3d 300 (2011)
Effective Date
2011-12-01

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

626 chars
B.
  Stevens next contends that the district court erred in
concluding that her claims were moot. As will become
apparent below, our resolution of this issue will
necessarily require us to address Stevens’ third claim on
appeal, whether a strict liability eviction violates the
Supreme Court’s dictate in Rucker. Whether a case is
moot is a question of law that we review de novo. Gates
v. City of Chicago, 623 F.3d 389, 413 (7th Cir. 2010); Olson v.
Brown, 594 F.3d 577, 580 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S.Ct.
3478 (2010). “A case is moot when the issues presented
12                                             No. 10-2724