Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)

Citation
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Parent Document
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1985-10-15

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

289 chars
Applying those guidelines, we have concluded that although the issue of frivolity is close in this case, an award of damages to defendant under Rule 84.19 is not warranted. Defendant’s motion is, accordingly, denied. Judgment affirmed. PREWITT, C.J., and HOGAN, P.J., and MAUS, J., concur.