O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Citation
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Parent Document
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-10-15
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5239701/obar-v-nickels/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (58)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Full Text
994 charsWe fail to see how the absence of such notice compelled a judgment for plaintiff in the circumstances here. Assuming, without deciding, that defendant could not have obtained plaintiff’s eviction through the judicial process absent proper notice, the point became moot when plaintiff moved out instead of staying put. Moreover, except for plaintiff’s moving expense *957($32.55 rental for the “U-haul” 1 and $5 for gasoline for it2), there was no evidence that plaintiff sustained any damage by reason of moving. He found new living quarters immediately, and it is inferable from the record that the new quarters were more satisfactory to him than the apartment. The record is barren of any evidence regarding the amount of rent plaintiff pays for the new quarters; consequently, there is no showing that the move was financially detrimental. The trial court could have found that plaintiff’s moving expenses were offset by the rent-free days that he remained in the apartment before departing.