Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)

Citation
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Parent Document
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1985-10-15

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

639 chars
Plaintiff, citing Antoine v. McCaffery, 335 S.W.2d 474 (Mo.App.1960), and Hussey v. Robison, 285 S.W.2d 603 (Mo.1955), exhorts us to weigh the evidence and reach our own conclusions as to which testimony is deserving of belief. We cannot accept that invitation, inasmuch as the scope of our review in this court-tried case is firmly established by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32[1] (Mo. banc 1976). The judgment of the trial court will be sustained unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, unless it erroneously declares the law, or unless it erroneously applies the law.