Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)

Citation
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Parent Document
O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1985-10-15

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text

628 chars
Neither party requested that the trial court render an opinion containing a statement of the grounds for its decision, nor did either party specify any controverted fact issues for the trial court to determine. See: Rule 73.01(a)(2), Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure (15th ed. 1984). The trial court made no findings of fact or conclusions of law. Consequently, all facts are presumed found in accordance with the judgment, and the judgment is to be upheld under any reasonable theory supported by the evidence. Elliott v. West, 665 S.W.2d 683, 689-90[4] (Mo.App.1984); Lohrmann v. Carter, 657 S.W.2d 372, 376[1] (Mo.App.1983).