O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Citation
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Parent Document
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-10-15
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5239701/obar-v-nickels/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (58)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
- O'Bar v. Nickels, 698 S.W.2d 950 (1985)
Full Text
496 charsDefendant testified she went to the apartment building and observed that “the furnace was burning and the blower was running.” She explained that the furnace that heats plaintiff’s apartment is a “forced air automatic gas furnace” and that it also heats three other apartments. The furnace is “automatically controlled by a single thermostat located in the utility room.” The tenants of the respective apartments control the flow of heat by “keeping their vents opened and closed as they desire.”