ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Citation
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Parent Document
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
Full Text
427 chars. Specifically, tenant alleged (1) the rent increase was larger than the increase allowed by law, (2) notice was not given thirty days prior to the rent increase, (3) landlord did not file proper rent increase forms with RACD, (4) the rent charged exceeded any legal rent ceiling, (5) the rent ceiling on file for the unit was improper, and (6) the building in which the unit is located was not properly registered with RACD. 2