ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Citation
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Parent Document
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
Full Text
343 charspaid. Thus, the trial court explained that it read the order as stating only that the landlord charged illegal levels of rent and “decline[d] to find as a matter of law that the [tenant] has paid money that in fact she never paid.” Accordingly, the trial court refused to order a refund in connection with tenant’s motion for summary judgment.