ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Citation
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Parent Document
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
Full Text
610 charsIn October, 2005, RACD held a hearing on tenant’s petition at which landlord did not appear. Tenant passed away on August 14, 2006, and her personal representative proceeded with the actions on behalf of the estate. Some six months after her death, on March 28, 2007, RACD issued a written order, ruling that the dwelling had not been properly registered and that the landlord had attempted to charge an illegal level of rent. Importantly, we note that RACD further determined, citing to D.C.Code § 42-3509.01(a) (2001), 2 14 DCMR §§ 4217.3 and 3826, 3 and Kapusta v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Com’n,