ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Citation
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Parent Document
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
- ESTATE OF BLACKWELL v. Campbell, 983 A.2d 320 (2009)
Full Text
488 charsOn December 26, 2007, tenant filed a motion in the Landlord and Tenant case (2005-LTB-020171) to attach funds in the court registry in order to satisfy the judgment she had obtained in the Civil Division case (2007-CA-003918). On January 18, 2008, the court denied the motion to attach, stating that the funds in the registry were the subject of a pending McNeal (v. Habib, 346 A.2d 508 (D.C.1975)) hearing 6 and were not rent that had been paid. On February 4, 2008, following the McNeal