Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Citation: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Parent Document: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Jurisdiction: Kentucky (state)
Effective Date: 1967-02-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1741429/collings-v-scheen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Full Text

237 chars

Again, there is no question or issue of fact that Scheen was unable to meet the monthly installments. Nor is it questioned that he was unable to negotiate the loan by which the sale was to be financed and Col-lings paid for the property.