Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Citation: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Parent Document: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Jurisdiction: Kentucky (state)
Effective Date: 1967-02-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1741429/collings-v-scheen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Full Text

219 chars

The record presents no contrariety of evidence in any material respect. But to give intelligent answers to the divergent contentions of law made by the parties, it will he necessary to quote extensively from the record.