Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Citation: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Parent Document: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Jurisdiction: Kentucky (state)
Effective Date: 1967-02-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1741429/collings-v-scheen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Full Text

222 chars

The answer of defendants admitted the making of a contract with the plaintiffs on March 22, 1960, but denied that it was a contract for the sale and purchase of real estate and denied ad other allegations of the complaint.