Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Citation: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Parent Document: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Jurisdiction: Kentucky (state)
Effective Date: 1967-02-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1741429/collings-v-scheen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Full Text

219 chars

On March 22, 1960, the parties entered into a contract relating to a house and lot located on Saratoga Drive in Louisville. The portions of the contract germane to the instant factual and legal imbroglio are as follows: