Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Citation: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Parent Document: Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Jurisdiction: Kentucky (state)
Effective Date: 1967-02-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1741429/collings-v-scheen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)
Collings v. Scheen, 415 S.W.2d 589 (1967)

Full Text

166 chars

The defendants moved the trial court for summary judgment. The motion was heard on the affidavits of both sides and on the depositions of defendants taken by the *590