Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Farris v. Laurel Explosives, Inc., 797 S.W.2d 487 (1990)

Citation
Farris v. Laurel Explosives, Inc., 797 S.W.2d 487 (1990)
Parent Document
Farris v. Laurel Explosives, Inc., 797 S.W.2d 487 (1990)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1990-09-07

Full Text

397 chars
The Vokins Court, in granting qualified approval to a perpetual lease, said they would not be upheld unless the language was clear, plain and unambiguously expressed. We quote from Vokins: “The language employed can be given no other meaning, and the intention to so provide *490could not have been expressed more certainly and unequivocally.” The Hite case merely echoed the sentiments of Vokins.