Section 59
- Citation
- Section 59
- Parent Document
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-10-12
Other Sections in This Document (68)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
Full Text
413 charsThe appellant Miles asserts that the rational basis for limiting the URLTA to counties containing cities of the first class and urban-county governments is (1) the number and density of tenants in such counties, (2) the closeness of the dwellings in these urban areas and the corresponding health problems, (3) the amount of substandard housing and prevention of economic waste, and (4) its current non-appli *517