Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Citation
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-10-12
Other Sections in This Document (68)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Miles v. Shauntee, 664 S.W.2d 512 (1983)
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
- Section 59
Full Text
655 charsSubsequently, on May 5 and 26, 1981, the Court held a hearing on the merits. After the hearing on the merits, the Jefferson Circuit Court ruled that the housing conditions in question were dilapidated, but declined to recognize a cause of action for the tenant based either on an implied warranty of habitability or on the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act. In addition, the Jefferson Circuit Court found the premises not uninhabitable. The Jefferson Circuit Court dismissed the tenant’s counterclaim and sustained the landlord’s forcible detainer action. The tenant appealed from these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered by the Circuit Court.