Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)

Citation: Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)
Parent Document: Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2011-09-07
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2463976/seashore-villa-assn-v-hagglund-... ↗

Full Text

652 chars

The only finding the Park challenges pertaining to this issue is finding of fact 11: “Some tenants have at their own expense improved the carports and sheds, e.g., by adding walls, electrical power and windows. The act of providing improvements alone is not sufficient to change the ownership of the underlying structures.” CP at 553. It appears that the Park is challenging this finding on the basis that it is actually a conclusion of law. However, this finding appears to pertain to the issue of whether the Park violated ROW 59.20.135, not the contract issue. We have already affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the Park violated this statute. 7

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text