Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)

Citation
Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)
Parent Document
Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Family Ltd. Partnership, 260 P.3d 906 (2011)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2011-09-07

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text

571 chars
104 Wn. App. at 181. Division One of this court held that the landlord did not violate the MHLTA by requiring her tenants to start paying for utilities because (1) nothing in the MHLTA stated that a landlord could not increase or impose fees for services in addition to the rent, but there were portions of the statute stating that any increases must be equitable and (2) the only limitation on increases in the MHLTA is the requirement that rental rates be increased only upon lease expiration and three months’ notice. McGahuey, 104 Wn. App. at 182. The court reasoned: