State v. City of Sunnyside (2024)

Citation: State v. City of Sunnyside (2024)
Parent Document: State v. City of Sunnyside (2024)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2024-06-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9600119/state-v-city-of-sunnyside/ ↗

Full Text

1,006 chars

7
          As discussed infra, we reverse the order granting summary judgment. We therefore do
not reach the denial of reconsideration.
        8
          Briefs of amici curiae have been filed by the Fair Housing Center of Washington and Fred
T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Northwest Justice Project, and the American Civil
Liberties Union of Washington.
        9
          The respondents argue as a threshold matter that some of the tenant declarations should
be excluded from consideration as hearsay or double hearsay. See CR 56(e) (affidavits and
declarations in support of summary judgment must set forth facts as would be admissible in
evidence); ER 802. However, out-of-court statements may be admissible if they satisfy a hearsay
exception or if offered for a purpose other than the truth of the matter asserted. ER 803(a); ER
                                               15
State v. City of Sunnyside et al.
No. 101205-5 I.      Attorney General Authority under RCW 43.10.030(1)

Other Sections in This Document (941)

Full Text