the subject premises on March 25, 2025, along with the individuals named on the
household composition. (NYSCEF Doc. 20).
Respondent's Eviction
On the date of the eviction, Respondent Ingram filed her first post-eviction order to
show cause (hereinafter "post-evict"), seeking restoration to the subject premises. On the
return date, Respondent Ingram appeared in Court and signed a stipulation with
Petitioner wherein the parties agreed that Respondent Ingram would be restored to
possession contingent upon the payment of $23,532.89 on or before April 24, 2025.
(NYSCEF Doc. 22). The agreed-upon amount also encompassed marshal fees and
moving/storage fees for Respondent's personal property. On the stipulated payment
deadline, Respondent Ingram filed her second post-evict order to show cause, which was
signed by the Court and placed on the calendar for April 28, 2025. (NYSCEF Doc. 23).
The Legal Aid Society filed a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondent Ingram on
the return date and made an application to adjourn for submission of supplemental papers
in support of the pro-se post-evict order to show cause. The Court granted [*2]the application, set a briefing schedule, and adjourned the
case to May 16, 2025. (NYSCEF Doc. 25).
In the supplemental affirmation, Respondent Ingram stated that Petitioner and the
City Marshal (hereinafter "Marshal Schain") conducted a full eviction, moving the
entirety of her personal property to a storage facility in the Bronx. (NYSCEF Doc. 27, at
¶¶ 6-7). Respondent Ingram also informed the Court that her entire family
was evicted from the subject premises, including her eighteen-year-old son for whom the
Petitioner did not have a judgment or warrant. (Id.). After the eviction,