Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Citation
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-08-18
Other Sections in This Document (37)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Deguise, 180 Vt. 214 (2006)
Full Text
1,210 chars¶ 12. Tenants’ argument is essentially that other residents in the apartment complex occupy a government-subsidized apartment (although tenants do not), and it would be inequitable to expect low-income tenants to procure their own insurance or to have adequate bargaining power when negotiating lease agreements. Although tenants advanced this argument below in their memorandum in support of their motion for summary judgment, the superior court did not address it. Nonetheless, we cannot conclude that it is the role of this Court to rewrite the parties’ agreement solely because this landlord rents apartments to persons of low income and presumably limited ability to bargain on lease terms. The parties here filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and neither responded to the other that any facts were in dispute. Tenants’ factual statement submitted with their summary judgment motion contains no facts to indicate the income or relative bargaining power of these particular defendant-tenants. Where tenants have failed to present any facts in their motion to support their argument that it would be inequitable to hold them to the terms of their lease agreement, we decline to consider this argument.