Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Citation
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Parent Document
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-05-14
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
- Garganta v. Mobile Village, Inc., 730 A.2d 1 (1999)
Full Text
243 chars681 A.2d 271, 275 (R.I.1996). The doctrine “serves as an ‘absolute bar to a second cause of action where there exists identity of parties, identity of issues, and finality of judgment in an earlier action.’ ” Id. (quoting Gaudreau v. Blasbalg,