73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)

Citation: 73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Parent Document: 73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2010-03-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2273167/73-75-main-avenue-llc-v-pp-door... ↗

Full Text

990 chars

the initial payment consisting of first month’s rent, last month’s rent and security deposit. The defendants argue that this represents more than a mere misstatement by the court, as was evident from the court’s subsequent rhetorical question, “why would PP Door and ... Li make out a check for the equivalent of three month’s rent—actually two months rent plus one month of security, if it was not their intention to allow . . . Zhang to initiate this lease and that they were the responsible parties and . . . that he was authorized to act as their representative?” The court went on to say that “[t]he fact that [Li] thought later on and stopped paying because [Zhang] had an accident and she realized that it probably was not a profitable lease any longer is of no consequence.” The defendants claim that the court had no factual basis on which to make this statement. In sum, the defendants reason that the court’s decision cannot stand because it relied on incorrect factual findings.

Other Sections in This Document (71)

Full Text