Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)

Citation
73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Parent Document
73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2010-03-30

Other Sections in This Document (71)

Full Text

886 chars
After months went by without receiving payment, the plaintiff initiated a summary process action to recover possession of the property, in which it was successful. Additionally, on August 3, 2006, the plaintiff filed this action in order to recover money damages for past rent and the cost of finding a new tenant. Following trial, the court found in favor of the plaintiff. In its decision, the court rejected the defendants’ special defense that it lacked personal jurisdiction over PP Door or Li because neither had done business in Connecticut. Despite the fact that PP Door was a registered New York corporation that did business primarily in New York, the court found that there was sufficient evidence that PP Door had done business in Connecticut. The court cited as evidence the existence of the fax from Zhang to the real estate broker in Connecticut, which mentioned the *156