73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)

Citation: 73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Parent Document: 73-75 Main Avenue, LLC v. PP Door Enterprise, Inc., 991 A.2d 650 (2010)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2010-03-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2273167/73-75-main-avenue-llc-v-pp-door... ↗

Full Text

1,079 chars

In addition, the court found that as to PP Door’s liability, even if Li did not sign the lease and the guarantee, PP Door had held Zhang out as its representative. Specifically, the court found that “Li and the company, PP Door, entered into this lease through the execution of that lease document. They have clearly put themselves out to the landlord that they were the authorized party renting that property and, or, authorizing Zhang to act as their representative. And the further binding fact is the first check of August 8, 2005, made out to [the plaintiff] . . . for . . . the first month’s rent and the last month’s rent and one month security. Now, why would PP Door and ... Li make out a check for the equivalent of three month’s rent—actually two month’s rent plus one month of security, if it was not their intention to allow . . . Zhang to initiate this lease and that they were the responsible parties and that they were authorized or that he was authorized to act as their representative?” After the court rendered its decision, the defendants filed this appeal. I

Other Sections in This Document (71)

Full Text