Section 47a-21
- Citation
- Section 47a-21
- Parent Document
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-03-19
Other Sections in This Document (52)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
534 chars“The allowance of prejudgment interest as an element of damages is an equitable determination and a matter lying within the sound discretion of the trial court. . . . The determination of whether or not interest is to be recognized as a proper element of damage, is one to be made in view of the demands of justice rather than through an application of an arbitrary rule.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Stratford v. A. Secondino & Son, Inc., 133 Conn. App. 737, 749, 38 A.3d 179, cert. denied, 304 Conn. 918, 41 A.3d 305 (2012).