Section 47a-21

Citation: Section 47a-21
Parent Document: Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2013-03-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7914988/carrillo-v-goldberg/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21

Full Text

489 chars

As CUTPA does not prescribe an approach for calculating punitive damages but, instead, leaves this determination to the discretion of the trial court, in order to prevail on appeal, the plaintiffs must show that the court’s award of $3000 was an abuse of its discretion. Upon review of the record before us, we conclude that the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that the court, in awarding $3000 in punitive damages, abused its discretion or that injustice was done with this award. B