Section 47a-21
- Citation
- Section 47a-21
- Parent Document
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-03-19
Other Sections in This Document (52)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
867 charsIn the pretrial period, the plaintiffs made several requests for production of the banking records pertaining to the defendants’ checking and savings accounts opened at thé inception of the lease agreement. On July 1, 2011, the plaintiffs also made forty-two requests for admission, many of which concerned the defendants’ banking practices. The record, however, does not contain any pretrial discovery requests by the plaintiffs related to the defendants’ general financial condition. When the wealth of the defendants was broached by the defendants’ counsel during *315redirect examination, Keith Goldberg acknowledged that he was “a person of some means” and could have paid the plaintiffs their security deposit if he had known he was required to do so. The plaintiffs did not conduct a recross-examination of Keith Goldberg in order to pursue further this topic.