Section 47a-21

Citation: Section 47a-21
Parent Document: Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2013-03-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7914988/carrillo-v-goldberg/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Carrillo v. Goldberg, 141 Conn. App. 299 (2013)
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21
Section 47a-21

Full Text

371 chars

The plaintiffs next argue that the court calculated the accrued interest required to be delivered to tenants under § 47a-21 (i) on the incorrect amount of the security deposit they paid to the defendants. They argue that the court should have calculated interest pursuant to § 47a-21 (i) on the entire $9600 paid to the defendants at the inception of the lease. We agree.