Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Citation
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-08-01
Other Sections in This Document (68)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
- Section 42-110a
Full Text
395 charsto an unfair trade practice under CUTPA. The court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because the plaintiff failed to allege an unfair trade practice, as she was neither a tenant of the premises where the alleged CUTPA violation occurred, nor a third party beneficiary of McNelly’s lease. We agree and conclude that the plaintiff failed to allege a cognizable claim under CUTPA.