Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)

Citation
Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
Parent Document
Pinette v. McLaughlin, 901 A.2d 1269 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2006-08-01

Other Sections in This Document (68)

Full Text

633 chars
The plaintiff contends that a cause of action for breach of contract exists on the basis of her lease of 278 Farmington Avenue, or, alternatively, on the basis of McNelly’s lease of 276 Farmington Avenue, to which the plaintiff claims she is a third party beneficiary. The plaintiff argues that, under both leases, the defendants were contractually obligated to maintain the roof and drainage system at 276-278 Farmington Avenue in a fit and habitable condition and that the defendants breached this obligation, which resulted in the accumulation of ice on the outside steps of 276 Farmington Avenue and caused her to become injured.