Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Berish v. Bornstein, 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 530 (2006)

Citation
Berish v. Bornstein, 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 530 (2006)
Parent Document
Berish v. Bornstein, 21 Mass. L. Rptr. 530 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2006-05-22

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Full Text

575 chars
At least two Superior Court decisions have addressed this issue. See Arthaud v. Brignati, 10 Mass. L. Rptr. No. 18, 405 n.4 (October 11, 1999) (McDonald, J.) (declining to apply the adverse domination doctrine to a condominium board of trustees in a defective construction case), and Harris v. McIntyre, 2000 WL 942559 at *4-5 (Mass.Super. June 27, 2000) (Gants, J.) (acknowledging plaintiffs’ argument that the statute of limitations was toUed whUe the developer dominated the board, but concluding that it could not be asserted against an independent construction company).