DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)

Citation
O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Parent Document
O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2019-10-18
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4671128/oconnor-v-kadrmas/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (406)

Full Text

664 chars 
18POK's practice was to cut checks to the three
shareholders for the final quarterly distribution, even though
the figures would not become final until sometime the following
year. The shareholders were then expected to not cash the
checks until the figures were finalized, and they complied with
that expectation. Following this practice, O'Connor received a
check for the December 2013 quarterly distribution, but did not
deposit or cash it. Later, Kadrmas caused the check to be
voided because, in his view, there were no net profits.
                                                                   23 Specifically, he asked to replace the first page of his