O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)

Citation: O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Parent Document: O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2019-10-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4671128/oconnor-v-kadrmas/ ↗

Full Text

837 chars

8 Kadrmas continued on a different front: "I have also
recently learned that [Murphy] set up a system where I have been
unknowingly paying a portion of expenses of PLSC of which I do
not have ownership interest. Apparently, under the system that
was set up, PLSC has been paying POK a flat rate of $4500 per
month for its expenses. However, the real expense of PLSC being
fronted by POK is $15104.65 per month. Therefore, there is a
shortfall of $10604.65 in payment to POK each month. For one
year it becomes $127,235.80. Since this expense would have been
fairly shared 3 ways -- the portion I was overcharged is
$42,418.60 per year. Since this has occurred without my
knowledge for the 8 years that I have been a partner at POK, I
am owed $330,348.80 from PLSC."
                                                                     9

Other Sections in This Document (406)

Full Text