O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)

Citation: O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Parent Document: O'Connor v. Kadrmas (2019)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2019-10-18
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4671128/oconnor-v-kadrmas/ ↗

Full Text

800 chars

"I am glad that you finally stated the obvious in your
     email, i.e, that it is your 'intent is [sic] to join OCB'
     after you depart. Your prior lawyers had denied you were
     negotiating with OCB even after it became clear that that
     denial was not true. The fact that you are planning to
     join our direct competitor is not consistent with
     furthering the best interests of POK. Because of this, I
     believe it only makes sense that you resign your position
     as a shareholder during the pendency of your planned exit
     -- i.e. immediately. Otherwise, you have an impermissible
     and irresistible conflict of interest." 8 Kadrmas further stated that he would not allow O'Connor to solicit POK employees or doctors. Over Kadrmas's protests, O'Connor, Post, and Murphy

Other Sections in This Document (406)

Full Text