DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 61–80 of 100 results

Women's HealthPartners, Inc. v. River Landing, LLC, 414 S.W.3d 79 (2013)

Women's HealthPartners, Inc. v. River Landing, LLC, 414 S.W.3d 79 (2013) Missouri state

Women's HealthPartners, Inc. v. River Landing, LLC 414 S.W.3d 79 Date filed: 2013-11-26 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5286016/womens-healthpartners-inc-v-river-landing-llc/ --- 020lead by Amburg --- INTRODUCTION

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

[W]e object to the sufficiency of evidence with respect to each of these acts of retaliation listed in paragraph 2. We do not believe that they have submitted enough evidence to offer these adverse or these alleged retaliatory acts...

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995) Missouri state

...He alleges the trial court erred in denying this claim because the plain language of section 213.070(2) only required him to prove that Hereford retaliated against him because of his participation in proceedings before the Commission.

Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc., 916 S.W.2d 845 (1996)

Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc., 916 S.W.2d 845 (1996) Missouri state

Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc. 916 S.W.2d 845 Date filed: 1996-02-01 Doctrine: retaliation Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2449949/amador-v-leas-auto-sales-leasing-inc/ --- 010combined by Barney --- *848 BARNEY, Judge.

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995) Missouri state

(2) To retaliate or discriminate in any manner against any other person because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by this chapter or because such person has filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in any...

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995)

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995) Missouri state

...Section 213.070(2), RSMo 1994, defines “an unlawful discriminatory practice” to include retaliation against “any other person ... because such person” has filed a complaint under the Missouri Human Rights Act. The issue in this case is whether a former...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

(2) To retaliate or discriminate in any manner against any other person because such person has opposed any practice prohibited by this chapter or because such person has filed a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in any...

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005)

Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 170 S.W.3d 1 (2005) Missouri state

...The court ultimately reversed and remanded the trial court’s judgment dismissing the plaintiffs petition for retaliatory discharge because the plaintiff sufficiently alleged he was discharged in retaliation for his actions, and his termination was in violation of a clearly...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

"To establish a prima facie case of retaliation requires that a plaintiff prove: (1) she complained of discrimination; (2) the employer took adverse action against [her]; and (3) a causal relationship existed between the complaint and the adverse action." Minze...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...An adverse employment action occurs where a former employee suing for retaliation, demonstrates that the retaliatory action adversely affects his/her future employment or employability.

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...at 625-26 (other citations omitted). "Our Missouri Supreme Court has explained that, although federal law requires a retaliation claimant to demonstrate that an 'adverse employment action' has occurred ('adverse employment action' generally meaning some change in pay, benefits, seniority...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...She essentially concludes that he violated the policy, but he didn't do it because it was gender or in retaliation. I think there's a risk of-in eliciting all of these conclusions to confuse the jury about whether...

Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016)

Amoso Realty, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Monique Milton, Defendant/Respondent, and Bryce Weathers, Proposed Intervenor/Appellant., 513 S.W.3d 373 (2016) Missouri state

...The counterclaims alleged that Amoso and Weathers were negligent for failing to exterminate the bed bugs, and further alleged that Amoso and Weathers brought the rent-and-possession action in retaliation for Milton`s reporting bed bugs to the St...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...2015), the Department argues that Mignone failed to prove a submissible claim that the log entries constituted actionable retaliation, because the Department "did not reduce [Mignone's] pay, lower her work hours, and did not change her job duties" as...

Kulaga v. Kulaga, 149 S.W.3d 570 (2004)

Kulaga v. Kulaga, 149 S.W.3d 570 (2004) Missouri state

...Additionally, the trial court found that Mother’s motion to suspend Father’s visitation was filed in retaliation for Father’s motion for contempt and was, therefore, frivolous. This appeal followed.

Section 213

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995) Missouri state

...City of Ladue, 25 F.3d 702, 703 (8th Cir.1994).[1] An adverse employment action occurs where a former employee suing for retaliation, demonstrates that the retaliatory action adversely affects his/her future employment or employability. Bailey v. USX...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...12, the verdict director submitting Mignone's claim that she was subject to retaliation based on her complaints of sexual harassment by Kevin Fagan. Instruction No. 12 included six alleged retaliatory actions, stated in the disjunctive. According to the Department...

Section 213

Keeney v. Hereford Concrete Products, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 622 (1995) Missouri state

...City of Ladue, 25 F.3d 702, 703 (8th Cir.1994).1 An adverse employment action occurs where a former employee suing for retaliation, demonstrates that the retaliatory action adversely affects his/her future employment or em-ployability. Bailey v...

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018)

Mignone v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 546 S.W.3d 23 (2018) Missouri state

...Those unobjected-to interview summaries were obviously relevant to Mignone's retaliation claim based on Johnson's interviews. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the probative value of the report as a whole was not...