Section 18
- Citation
- Section 18
- Parent Document
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1987-06-22
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
Full Text
414 charsThe plaintiff contends, and we agree, that § 14 and § 18 of c. 186 were designed to protect different interests and that the defendants’ action in locking the plaintiff out of the “conference room” constituted two separate injuries. Because separate injuries were involved, the judge erred in not awarding damages to the plaintiff under both § 14 and § 18. This case is unlike Calimlim v. Foreign Car Center, Inc.,