Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Citation
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Parent Document
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1987-06-22
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Ianello v. Court Management Corp., 509 N.E.2d 1 (1987)
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
- Section 18
Full Text
432 charsWhen Hood learned of Harp’s attempts to interest other tenants in resisting the rent increase, she associated the plaintiff with the activity and told Harp that the plaintiff could no longer use the “conference room” for his weights, and that it would cost him $20 or $25 a month to get it back. Thereafter, the locks in the “conference room” were changed and the plaintiff *323 lost the use of the “conference room” until August 9,