Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Granberry v. Islay Investments, 161 Cal. App. 3d 382 (1984)

Citation
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 161 Cal. App. 3d 382 (1984)
Parent Document
Granberry v. Islay Investments, 161 Cal. App. 3d 382 (1984)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1984-10-30

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

628 chars
To further confound anyone trying to make sense out of the statute, it might appear from subdivision (e) that function is in fact tied to the definition of “security.” That subdivision is related to subdivision (b) because it states that “[t]he landlord may claim of the security only such amounts as are reasonably necessary to remedy tenant defaults in the payment of rent, to repair damages to the premises caused by the tenant, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, or to clean such premises, if necessary, upon termination of the tenancy.” Subdivision (e) in fact only states when the landlord may forfeit the security. *388