Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)

Citation
Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)
Parent Document
Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2006-08-09

Other Sections in This Document (187)

Full Text

351 chars
The court did not err. While appellants argue that the reason landlords keep sufficient funds in liquid, nonvolatile investments is to make sure they can comply with their obligation to return security deposits to tenants, there was insufficient evidence to establish that assumption. The assertion by appellants’ economic expert that landlords should