DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)

Citation
Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)
Parent Document
Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2006-08-09
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2255746/small-property-owners-v-city-co... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (187)

Full Text

397 chars 
of the government regulation. We begin our discussion with that determination. We then examine whether a takings clause analysis is appropriate where, as here, the governmental regulation requires the payment of money by one private party to another. Lastly, we conclude that the trial court did not err in ruling that appellants failed to prove a taking. 1. Appellants’ Asserted Property Interest