DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)

Citation
Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Parent Document
Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1993-10-21
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2270028/kavanau-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

513 chars 
It is not and could not be disputed that Kavanau could not obtain a fair return under the Board’s approach. To the contrary, his deficit for the year in question would be $111,871— $98,099 of allowed operating expenses and capital improvements, plus $18,400 of expenses Kavanau incurred but the Board determined were “unnecessary,” plus $44,000 in debt service, less $43,444 in existing rents, less the allowed increase of $5,184, equals $111,871. (See Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of Cotati, supra,